What educational administrators can learn from the Virginia Tech tragedy

Submitted by Matt Scherer on Sat, 12/05/2009 - 2:44pm.
::
Share this on Facebook!

If a crazed gunman was holding students hostage in a lecture hall, doesn't it make sense that university employees would try to reach their children who were students? And, certainly, I would make sure that garbage collectors would want to know now to come on campus to collect our trash.
Today's Express-News article on the Virginia Tech tragedy shows how most of us who are parents would react. Yet, it also shows that college administrators don't really think through their emergency communications programs here.
If I was a president of an educational institution who read the published report of this article, I would want to gather my security forces, my communications professionals and my public affairs team to have them create a way to communicate to students on an assortment of emergncies such as crazed gunmen or if there's a blizzard that could shut down the roads near college.
For those educational administrators who want some unsolicited advice, I would first ask my public affairs professionals to create a Twitter site that addresses emergency responses. For inspiration, I would look at the Center for Disease Control Emergnecy Twitter site as a source of inspiration.
I would also invest in a phone texting service that can also alert all students of pending emergencies. And, after both are in place, I would instruct professors and staff to make sure to spend a couple of minutes every semester to remind their students of all emergency communication methods.
After all of those tools are in place, I would gather my security chief, my head computer person in charge of computers and phones along with my public affairs team to hold emergency simulation exercises at least three to four times a year. As an Air Force professional who planned these training exercises, I can tell you that practice of these emergency principles helps an executive team improve their response if needed.

Submitted by johnlogic on Mon, 12/07/2009 - 1:57am.

Your proposal might be a good start. However, talking about the problem (even in real time on Twitter, etc.) doesn't solve the problem.

The root of the problem of many violent crimes--such as mass killings at VT, UT, the NY WTC, Ft. Hood, post offices, a Waco Luby's, ESL, an Austin yogurt shop, or anywhere else--lies in the imbalance of power created when some nutcase takes up arms where a few ill-considered laws disarm the lawful.

In the wake of the Luby's massacre and at the behest of Suzanna Hupp, who witnessed both of her parents being killed there, the 1995 Texas legislature created a system for vetting, training, and licensing adult (age 21+) Texans to carry concealed firearms. Since then, about 10% of Texans are now licensed. I estimate that only 10% of those--1% of all Texans--are regularly armed. I believe that even this small 1-in-100 chance of encountering armed resistance is enough to discourage many potential perpetrators, probably (therefore) decreases the number of violent crimes, and that one or more armed licensees could stop a nutcase on a rampage.

Unfortunately, these vetted, trained, and licensed Texans are still prohibited from protecting themselves (and potentially others) in many places declared "gun free", such as schools.

Bills before the 2009 Texas legislature would have changed this on the campuses of public universities, but the session ended before the bills could be put to vote.

- John

Submitted by technoronin on Mon, 12/07/2009 - 3:31am.

There are a lot of problems with the various delivery methods. Other Universities have tried various things, but run into scalability problems. A friend of mine at CMU has been involved with building out various solutions there, so I recommend researching what Carnegie-Mellon has done to find out what works and what doesn't.